The UConn-Duke game was similarly thrilling, going to overtime before being decided on Christian Laettner's buzzer-beater (his less famous one). What I noticed in watching this game over again was that both teams ran a very simple offense: get the ball to Laettner/Bobby Hurley/Tate George.
Compare that to the Ohio State-Florida game Monday night, which could have been an NBA game for the style of play. Even though OSU featured an NBA-caliber center, they spread the ball around a lot. Florida has five guys who can all score. Both teams ran a balanced offense that allowed them to score inside or out, and involved everyone. Has the game changed that much from 17 years ago? I think so, considering that the Duke team that beat UConn in a thriller ran into UNLV in the finals and lost to what was unquestionably the most talented roster in college basketball at the time. That kind of disparity doesn't really exist any more at the top tiers, not because of talent fleeing to the NBA, but because there is (I think) so much more talent at the college level. A school like Florida wasn't considered elite until their run last year; they will be now, because they'll continue to attract new talent. The explosion of media attention beyond just sports nuts has increased the pool of talented players, despite the most talented ones jumping to the pros as soon as they're allowed.
Note that all of this hasn't made the college game more interesting to watch, but then, I have trouble focusing through an entire NBA game as well.
And for your amusement, a mis-captioned ESPN.com photo (from DJ Gallo's Masters Preview, now corrected).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bb27/5bb2777d89af3030fa8334cb8fa7fcd940b77aae" alt=""
2 comments:
What? Rooting for Duke? You lie. Impossible...
It is true, youngster. There was once such a time...
Post a Comment